Webquest Lesson Plan


Instructor:  Curt Barford

Type of Lesson:  Webquest

Lesson Plan Title:  Environmental Chemistry: Water Pollution

Discipline:  Chemistry

Target Population:
Grade Level:  High School
Population Characteristics:  This lesson will be conducted in chemistry lab.  Each lab class consists of 10-15 students.  Most students are in grade 11, with some accelerated students in grade 10.  Overall, the students in the class are highly motivated learners.  They show interest in the subject and tend to be extremely self-motivated.
Lesson Groupings:  Pairs

Curriculum Links:  All required labs for New York State Regents Chemistry are completed by the end of May.  As a result an additional month of class time is available in the laboratory class.  This time will be utilized to complete a unit on environmental chemistry.  For many students chemistry is an extremely abstract subject.  Students are dealing with many concepts that they can't visibly see.  They can't see an individual atom or a bond between elements.  Attempts are made throughout the year to make the subject as relatable as possible.  It is for this reason that students are introduced to topics in environmental chemistry.  The subject of chemistry is related to the world in which the students are living.  This webquest on an environmental chemistry topic will take this a step further.  The students will study chemistry with respect to water pollution.  In particular they will be examining water pollution in the Hudson River, a body of water that all class members are very familiar with.

Objectives:
Students will be able to...
Media Literacy Objectives:
2.  Make informed choices among technology systems, resources, and services.
5.  Use technology tools and resources for managing and communicating personal/professional information.
7.  Routinely and efficiently use online information resources to meet needs for collaboration, research, publication, communication, and productivity.
8.  Select and apply technology tools for research, information analysis, problem solving, and decision making in content learning.
10.  Collaborate with peers, experts, and others to contribute to a content-related knowledge base by using technology to compile, synthesize, produce, and disseminate information, models, and other creative works.

Materials and Timing:  Seven 45 minute lessons.  Computers with internet access, PowerPoint and Word will be necessary.  A projector for a computer will be used on Day 4.

Scope and Sequence:
Task 1: Days 1-4
Task 2: Days 5 and 7
Task 3: Days 6 and 7
Wrapping Up: Day 7
Supplemental Materials:  Paper, colored pencils, markers for Task 3.  All other materials will be provided by students.

Evaluation of Students:

1 Point
3 Points
5 Points
Total Points
Task 1




Content Accuracy
Content is vague or wrong and is not referenced.  Sutdents only discuss general OR local causes of pollution.
Content is accurate, but lacking references for support.  Students vaguely discuss general and local causes/impacts of water pollution.
Content within the presentation is accurate and referenced.  Students thoroughly covered major causes and impacts of water pollution, both in general and in the Hudson River.

Organization of PowerPoint Presenation
Presentation is unorganized and appears to have been hastily constructed.
Presentation is organized, but is generally bland, lacking color, images, or transitions.
Presentation is very neat and organized.  Interesting colors, images, and transitions are utilized.

Presentation
Only one student presents
OR
Presentation in nothing more than reading the slides.
Both students participate, but they often read from the slides.  Students do an adequate job of giving a persuasive presentation.
Both students participate in the presentation.  They reference the content of the presenation, but are not reading it directly from the slides.  Students do an excellent job of giving a persuasive presentation.

Task 2




Content Accuracy
Content of the article is false or no real researched content is present.
Some studied content is present and referenced.  Overall the content is accurate, but some content is unnecessary and does not add to the position being taken in the article.
Content is thorough, accurate, and referenced.  The content utilized is appropriately chosen for its relevance to the position being defended.

Stand Taken and Defended
Student poorly presents his/her stance.  No supporting information is used and it is difficult to determine the position being defended.
Student does a good job of presenting his/her position.  The use of some referenced information adds to the report.  The intended stance is obvious, but there is some flip-flopping.
Student supports his/her position very well.  Referenced data/information is provided to enhance and support the position taken.  Student does not waiver from this position.

Quality of Writing
Piece is poorly written.  Many spelling/grammar errors are present.
Piece is good, but some spelling and grammar errors detract from the writing.
Piece is extremely well written and easy to read.  There are no/minimal errors in spelling and grammar.

Task 3




Point Made in Cartoon
No statement is made by the cartoon.  Cartoon does not appear to be based on any facts or real images.
Students' cartoon is based on facts and images provided, but no real statement is made.

Students' cartoon made a point.  Students used research and images as a guide to develop a cartoon with a statement.

Originality/Visual Appeal
Students put little effort into the carton.  The idea is unoriginal and the execution is lacking.
OR
The cartoon is good, but only one student worked on the task.
Cartoon is orginal, but the presentation is lacking.  The students appear to have put some effort into the cartoon.
OR
The cartoon is outstanding, but only one student worked on the task.
Cartoon is very original, neat, and colorful.  It is obvious the students did their best with the artistic aspects of the task.  Both students worked on the task.

Other




Use of Technology
Student often looking at websites unrelated to the WebQuest.
Made use of a few additional resources, but mainly used those provided.  Rarely looking at sites not related to the task.
Student used the computer wisely.  Did not feel limited to the sites provided and utilized sites found on his/her own.

Use of Time
Student often off task, wasting the time that was provided for the WebQuest.
Student rarely off-task.  Student was focused on the activities most of the time.
Student on task throughout the WebQuest and made excellent use of the class time  provided.

Total Points X 2 (out of 100)


Evaluation of the Lesson:  First, the evalulation of student work on the WebQuest will be done utilizing the above WebQuest.  If the evaluations of the students are generally positive, then the lesson will be viewed as a success.  Also, other means of evaluating the lesson will be more subtle.  If the students do not appear to be engaged when working on the WebQuest, then the lesson should be re-evaluated.  The websites being utilized within the WebQuest will be re-examined to determine if they are not engaging enough for the students or do not have provide a good enough basis to begin working on the tasks.  Also, if the products presented at the end of each task are lacking in appropriate content, then the websites being provided will again be re-evaluated.  Each task will can be examined individually to determine its effectivenes.  A failure in one aspect of the lesson does not indicate that the entire lesson has to be abandoned or modified.  After first utilizing the WebQuest in class the time allotted for the lesson will be examined.  If too much or too little time is allotted for the WebQuest the lesson can be adapted accordingly.  Lastly, the lesson will be evaluated based on the students' abilities to connect to the topic and the subject of chemistry.  If the students are able to connect with the topic of pollution of the Hudson River the lesson will be viewed as a success.  Additionally, if the students are able to begin to see how the subject of chemistry is related to the world around them, then the lesson will be considered successful.  The students should see that while the use of chemistry is generally positive (i.e. the use of pesticides, the development of plastics) there are some unintended negative side effects.

Return to Table of Contents