1 Point |
3 Points |
5
Points |
Total Points |
|
Task 1 |
||||
Content Accuracy |
Content
is vague or wrong and is not referenced. Sutdents only discuss
general OR local causes of pollution. |
Content
is accurate, but lacking references for support. Students vaguely
discuss general and local causes/impacts of water pollution. |
Content
within the presentation is accurate and referenced. Students
thoroughly covered major causes and impacts of water pollution, both in
general and in the Hudson River. |
|
Organization of PowerPoint Presenation |
Presentation
is unorganized and appears to have been hastily constructed. |
Presentation
is organized, but is generally bland, lacking color, images, or
transitions. |
Presentation
is very neat and organized. Interesting colors, images, and
transitions are utilized. |
|
Presentation |
Only
one student presents OR Presentation in nothing more than reading the slides. |
Both
students participate, but they often read from the slides.
Students do an adequate job of giving a persuasive presentation. |
Both
students participate in the presentation. They reference the
content of the presenation, but are not reading it directly from the
slides. Students do an excellent job of giving a persuasive
presentation. |
|
Task 2 |
||||
Content Accuracy |
Content
of the article is false or no real researched content is present. |
Some
studied content is present and referenced. Overall the content is
accurate, but some content is unnecessary and does not add to the
position being taken in the article. |
Content
is thorough, accurate, and referenced. The content utilized is
appropriately chosen for its relevance to the position being defended. |
|
Stand Taken and Defended |
Student
poorly presents his/her stance. No supporting information is used
and it is difficult to determine the position being defended. |
Student
does a good job of presenting his/her position. The use of some
referenced information adds to the report. The intended stance is
obvious, but there is some flip-flopping. |
Student
supports his/her position very well. Referenced data/information
is provided to enhance and support the position taken. Student
does not waiver from this position. |
|
Quality of Writing |
Piece
is poorly written. Many spelling/grammar errors are present. |
Piece
is good, but some spelling and grammar errors detract from the writing. |
Piece
is extremely well written and easy to read. There are no/minimal
errors in spelling and grammar. |
|
Task 3 |
||||
Point Made in Cartoon |
No
statement is made by the cartoon. Cartoon does not appear to be
based on any facts or real images. |
Students'
cartoon is based on facts and images provided, but no real statement is
made. |
Students'
cartoon made a point. Students used research and images as a
guide to develop a cartoon with a statement. |
|
Originality/Visual Appeal |
Students
put little effort into the carton. The idea is unoriginal and the
execution is lacking. OR The cartoon is good, but only one student worked on the task. |
Cartoon
is orginal, but the presentation is lacking. The students appear
to have put some effort into the cartoon. OR The cartoon is outstanding, but only one student worked on the task. |
Cartoon
is very original, neat, and colorful. It is obvious the students
did their best with the artistic aspects of the task. Both
students worked on the task. |
|
Other |
||||
Use of Technology |
Student
often looking at websites unrelated to the WebQuest. |
Made
use of a few additional resources, but mainly used those
provided. Rarely looking at sites not related to the task. |
Student
used the computer wisely. Did not feel limited to the sites
provided and utilized sites found on his/her own. |
|
Use of Time |
Student
often off task, wasting the time that was provided for the WebQuest. |
Student
rarely off-task. Student was focused on the activities most of
the time. |
Student
on task throughout the WebQuest and made excellent use of the class
time provided. |
|
Total Points X 2 (out of 100) |